|
Strategic reset was a policy framework designed to stop counterproductive U.S. engagement in a fragmenting Iraq and to strengthen the United States' stance throughout the Middle East. In military terms, "reset" refers to "a series of actions to restore units to a desired level of combat capability commensurate with future mission requirements."〔("Readiness Committee Written Statement." Brigadier General Charles A. Anderson )〕 The proposal advocates harnessing U.S. military, economic, and diplomatic power to protect critical national security interests rather than expending this power in efforts to accommodate political progress amid multiple internal and external conflicts in Iraq. The plan for strategic reset entails four key measures: *acknowledging Iraq's political and demographic fragmentation *implementing prompt phased military redeployment *establishing local and regional methods for improving security and diplomacy in the Middle East *developing a functional strategy to resolve the Arab–Israeli Conflict. The framework was set forth in a 2007 report by the Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank based in Washington, D.C.〔(Center for American Progress: "Strategic Reset" ) retrieved 27 June 2007〕 ==Background== The Center for American Progress developed the framework for strategic reset on the premise that "with the Iraq war well into its fifth year, the Bush administration still lacks a realistic plan for the Middle East and Iraq."〔( www.americanprogress.org ) retrieved 27 June 2007〕 Senior Fellows Brian Katulis and Lawrence J. Korb, together with Peter Juul, laid out the plan in the form of a 64-page report released June 25, 2007. In 2007, when retired U.S. Marine Corps Gen. John J. Sheehan published a newspaper editorial explaining his decision not to accept the position of "War Czar" or White House implementation manager for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, he wrote: * “What I found in discussions with current and former members of this administration is that there is no agreed-upon strategic view of the Iraq problem or the region. ... Citing Gen. Sheehan, the report gives examples from what are described as seven years of relative progress in the Middle East (1994–2000) followed by seven years of setbacks (2001–2007), such as:〔(CAP Report )〕 *decline and stall of the Arab–Israeli peace process followed by irruption of war between Israel and Hezbollah *Late 1990s containment and sanction of Iraq replaced by refugee crises and war *Iran's new global influence and increased progress on its nuclear program *Hamas' movement from margin to center of its political stage and victory in the Palestinian legislative election, 2006. *Direct relation of oil prices to rising levels of violence in the Middle East Current U.S. strategy in Iraq relies on Iraqi political progress, increased numbers of U.S. troops in the country, and diversification of tactics for political and economic support.〔(Fact Sheet: The New Way Forward in Iraq )〕 While proponents of strategic reset support diversification, particularly as it regards "situat In 2006, the bipartisan Iraq Study Group released a report stressing the need for troop withdrawal and for redoubled diplomatic efforts, including efforts to address the Arab–Israeli conflict.〔(Iraq Study Group Report ) pp 6–7, retrieved 28 June 2007〕 The report also said that the Iraqi government "should accelerate assuming responsibility for Iraqi security," and that the "primary mission of U.S. forces in Iraq should evolve to one of supporting the Iraqi army, which would take over primary responsibility for combat operations."〔(Iraq Study Group Report ) p 7, retrieved 28 June 2007〕 Supporters of the strategic reset framework disagree with the latter terms, claiming that "the ISG was examining an Iraq that simply does not exist anymore," and that embedding U.S. forces to support Iraqi ones "would create unmanageable force protection problems for U.S. troops."〔(CAP "Strategic Reset" ) p 6 retrieved 28 June 2007〕 Strategic reset emphasizes making counterterrorism the primary role of U.S. troops, rather than engaging them in sectarian conflict.〔(CAP "Strategic Reset" ) p 30 retrieved 28 June 2007〕 It also emphasizes the necessity of recognizing Iraq's failed national reconciliation and adapting U.S. policy to the inevitable decentralization of Iraqi politics.〔(CAP "Strategic Reset" ) p 10 retrieved 28 June 2007〕 In 2007, the ''Washington Post'' described as "strategic reset" a proposal by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that took the form of "an unusually detailed public explanation of the new American effort to create a de facto alliance between Israel and moderate Arab states against Iranian extremism."〔("Rice's Strategic Reset." ''Washington Post'' 26 Jan 2007 )〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Strategic reset」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|